<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weezer gets it right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ninapaley.com/2009/11/04/weezer-gets-it-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ninapaley.com/2009/11/04/weezer-gets-it-right/</link>
	<description>Formerly America's Best-Loved Unknown Cartoonist, now independently animating a feature film, "Sita Sings the Blues."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:51:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Hancock</title>
		<link>http://blog.ninapaley.com/2009/11/04/weezer-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-38414</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Hancock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ninapaley.com/?p=729#comment-38414</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I gather they did re-shoot this, right? It&#039;s not a &quot;remixed&quot; version of a &quot;Snuggie&quot; commercial -- and they&#039;re presumeably sourcing the snuggie from that company anyway, right? ISTM that Fox wouldn&#039;t have _any_ basis to censor this, or am I wrong?

I gotta say though that there is something very bizarre feeling about this. I&#039;m not really a Weezer fan, so maybe I don&#039;t &quot;get&quot; them, but what I&#039;ve heard sounds very incongruous with the Snuggie image. The words &quot;sell out!&quot; keep bubbling up, even if only ironically, along with &quot;this is a prank, isn&#039;t it?&quot;. I wonder how well this is going over with their fans?

The world is getting weirder every day (suits me). :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I gather they did re-shoot this, right? It&#8217;s not a &#8220;remixed&#8221; version of a &#8220;Snuggie&#8221; commercial &#8212; and they&#8217;re presumeably sourcing the snuggie from that company anyway, right? ISTM that Fox wouldn&#8217;t have _any_ basis to censor this, or am I wrong?</p>
<p>I gotta say though that there is something very bizarre feeling about this. I&#8217;m not really a Weezer fan, so maybe I don&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; them, but what I&#8217;ve heard sounds very incongruous with the Snuggie image. The words &#8220;sell out!&#8221; keep bubbling up, even if only ironically, along with &#8220;this is a prank, isn&#8217;t it?&#8221;. I wonder how well this is going over with their fans?</p>
<p>The world is getting weirder every day (suits me). <img src='http://blog.ninapaley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.ninapaley.com/2009/11/04/weezer-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-38073</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ninapaley.com/?p=729#comment-38073</guid>
		<description>Not for better distribution, for more money. Musicians know they get the best distribution from people simply sharing their music digitally. Money comes from packaging. Content is free (whether or not they acknowledge that with a free license) but containers are not. Here they are packaging the content in a more valuable container than a mere jewel case. And the &quot;snuggie&quot; is more valuable because of its content - the connection with Weezer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not for better distribution, for more money. Musicians know they get the best distribution from people simply sharing their music digitally. Money comes from packaging. Content is free (whether or not they acknowledge that with a free license) but containers are not. Here they are packaging the content in a more valuable container than a mere jewel case. And the &#8220;snuggie&#8221; is more valuable because of its content &#8211; the connection with Weezer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.ninapaley.com/2009/11/04/weezer-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-38072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 07:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ninapaley.com/?p=729#comment-38072</guid>
		<description>So... they are actually selling the CD, but packaging it with a snuggie in order to get better distribution...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; they are actually selling the CD, but packaging it with a snuggie in order to get better distribution&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spineless Youtube</title>
		<link>http://blog.ninapaley.com/2009/11/04/weezer-gets-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-38071</link>
		<dc:creator>Spineless Youtube</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ninapaley.com/?p=729#comment-38071</guid>
		<description>Fox TV censored the video you embedded.  Since you don&#039;t say much about why you embedded it, I have no idea whether Fox TV has any actual copy&quot;right&quot; to do that or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox TV censored the video you embedded.  Since you don&#8217;t say much about why you embedded it, I have no idea whether Fox TV has any actual copy&#8221;right&#8221; to do that or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
